Comments on: Overpants http://burningprairie.com/posts/overpants/ Cleaning up my house, one mess at a time. Mon, 26 Apr 2010 22:05:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: wonder http://burningprairie.com/posts/overpants/#comment-124 wonder Tue, 08 Jul 2008 16:08:49 +0000 http://burningprairie.com/?p=67#comment-124 oh, dear. i got as far as "only a rebellious woman" this fella doesn't even allow us to claim ignorance, so why is he writing this? to put our keepers on notice that they must enforce modesty on our rebellious butts? Lord, these people are scary. oh, dear.

i got as far as “only a rebellious woman”

this fella doesn’t even allow us to claim ignorance, so why is he writing this? to put our keepers on notice that they must enforce modesty on our rebellious butts?

Lord, these people are scary.

]]> By: Renee http://burningprairie.com/posts/overpants/#comment-123 Renee Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:39:38 +0000 http://burningprairie.com/?p=67#comment-123 I loved reading your post but I fear the needless covering of women may be on a return. The mothers of that FLDS cult in Texas are now making money selling their dresses on line. It seems that people are desiring a return to "modesty". While I support the different efforts of women to be economically independent it is troubling that the basis of this is conforming to gender apparel that is limiting to women. I loved reading your post but I fear the needless covering of women may be on a return. The mothers of that FLDS cult in Texas are now making money selling their dresses on line. It seems that people are desiring a return to “modesty”. While I support the different efforts of women to be economically independent it is troubling that the basis of this is conforming to gender apparel that is limiting to women.

]]> By: Charlotte http://burningprairie.com/posts/overpants/#comment-122 Charlotte Fri, 04 Jul 2008 21:17:26 +0000 http://burningprairie.com/?p=67#comment-122 I wandered over here from Shakesville. I like the pants post. I'm a historian (I work on 16th-17th century Britain) and your post reminded me of a book I'd read a while back, in which the author described how people in the early 1600s were really wigged out about the fact that some fashionable women were wearing men's hats and doublets (like men) with skirts. Same outcry, about how this was a sin, and a terrible thing, and would Bring Down The Wrath Of God, because no one would be able to tell men and women apart! A bad thing, if you can't tell who you should oppress . . . I wandered over here from Shakesville. I like the pants post. I’m a historian (I work on 16th-17th century Britain) and your post reminded me of a book I’d read a while back, in which the author described how people in the early 1600s were really wigged out about the fact that some fashionable women were wearing men’s hats and doublets (like men) with skirts. Same outcry, about how this was a sin, and a terrible thing, and would Bring Down The Wrath Of God, because no one would be able to tell men and women apart! A bad thing, if you can’t tell who you should oppress . . .

]]> By: pidomon http://burningprairie.com/posts/overpants/#comment-121 pidomon Fri, 04 Jul 2008 14:36:56 +0000 http://burningprairie.com/?p=67#comment-121 That was perfect! That was perfect!

]]> By: Mary (MPJ) http://burningprairie.com/posts/overpants/#comment-120 Mary (MPJ) Fri, 04 Jul 2008 04:57:31 +0000 http://burningprairie.com/?p=67#comment-120 This made me giggle. Fundamentalists are such a good target for sarcasm. Viva pants! ;) This made me giggle. Fundamentalists are such a good target for sarcasm. Viva pants! ;)

]]>